Lithuania aFRR clearing prices
aFRR prices ·
Automatically-activated Frequency Restoration Reserve (aFRR) energy clearing prices for the Lithuanian bidding zone. One value per 15-minute Market Time Unit, per direction (up or down). Sourced from Elering, refreshed hourly.
Prices ranged from -319.8 to 605.3 EUR/MWh (range 925.1 EUR/MWh, 152 samples).
The peak on the up (system short) side was 605.3 EUR/MWh at 12:45, peaks at this level typically indicate a system scarcity event.
Negative prices appeared in 19 samples; the lowest was -319.8 EUR/MWh at 05:45.
Direction split: 81 × up (system short), 71 × down (system long).
Source: Elering / Baltic Transparency Dashboard via Volton, CC-BY-4.0.
Daily stats
| Series | Avg | Min | Max | Activations |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Up (system short) | 210,0 EUR/MWh | −156,7 | 605,3 | 81 |
| Down (system long) | 142,4 EUR/MWh | −319,8 | 393,6 | 71 |
Per 15-minute interval
| Time (Europe/Tallinn) | Up (system short) | Down (system long) |
|---|---|---|
| 15,9 | 0,4 | |
| 3,5 | 1,6 | |
| 74,5 | 99,1 | |
| 63,4 | 48,2 | |
| 16,7 | −26,0 | |
| — | −82,7 | |
| — | −20,3 | |
| 12,6 | 6,8 | |
| — | 154,3 | |
| — | 68,8 | |
| 31,7 | 82,4 | |
| 15,7 | −9,9 | |
| −29,3 | −27,7 | |
| −18,9 | −26,9 | |
| — | −31,5 | |
| — | −18,2 | |
| 112,1 | 48,6 | |
| 104,2 | 97,2 | |
| 26,8 | 86,6 | |
| −40,2 | −22,9 | |
| 1,5 | −64,7 | |
| −46,7 | −53,4 | |
| — | −197,1 | |
| −156,7 | −319,8 | |
| — | −123,7 | |
| 102,7 | 34,5 | |
| 131,1 | 171,5 | |
| 173,5 | — | |
| 208,0 | — | |
| 100,1 | — | |
| 66,4 | 25,3 | |
| 194,9 | — | |
| 173,5 | 166,8 | |
| 192,8 | 176,4 | |
| 156,0 | 141,8 | |
| 133,0 | 104,3 | |
| 191,0 | — | |
| 243,8 | — | |
| 268,2 | — | |
| 302,3 | — | |
| 240,9 | 354,9 | |
| 245,1 | 268,1 | |
| 287,2 | 226,1 | |
| 200,0 | 214,1 | |
| 226,3 | 156,8 | |
| 197,8 | 221,3 | |
| 226,3 | 199,5 | |
| 347,5 | — | |
| 200,7 | — | |
| 227,6 | — | |
| 473,9 | — | |
| 605,3 | — | |
| 224,5 | — | |
| 237,8 | — | |
| 241,7 | — | |
| 220,9 | 178,9 | |
| — | 211,3 | |
| 266,2 | 292,8 | |
| 227,2 | 252,9 | |
| 413,0 | 393,6 | |
| 428,1 | — | |
| 486,9 | — | |
| 417,6 | 337,7 | |
| 386,5 | — | |
| 516,0 | — | |
| 403,1 | — | |
| 299,4 | 315,7 | |
| 254,3 | 260,0 | |
| 236,6 | 258,3 | |
| — | 275,5 | |
| — | 260,9 | |
| — | 272,9 | |
| — | 214,2 | |
| 346,8 | 303,5 | |
| 334,2 | 280,7 | |
| — | 270,0 | |
| — | 280,9 | |
| 212,1 | 244,0 | |
| 318,1 | 229,5 | |
| 323,4 | 231,0 | |
| 251,9 | 240,4 | |
| 289,7 | 251,2 | |
| 235,9 | — | |
| 235,8 | 243,2 | |
| 227,6 | 197,5 | |
| 228,0 | 223,1 | |
| 296,7 | 224,0 | |
| 290,7 | 219,3 | |
| 231,7 | 186,3 | |
| 240,6 | — | |
| 181,2 | — | |
| 295,4 | 218,5 | |
| 253,5 | — | |
| 229,6 | 229,0 | |
| 213,1 | 217,2 | |
| 212,4 | 165,1 |
Source: Elering / Baltic Transparency Dashboard via Volton, CC-BY-4.0. · Hub: 7-day chart and methodology →